Why Sexting is an Attack on the Younger Generation
A quick search revealed one case so far, 2 young peoples lives blighted by the censorious and puritanical.
Interestingly, they do not mention in the headline that her boyfriend was also cautioned, and rightly so, but for the wrong reasons, in a nasty act of betrayal he shared the photos after they split up, what an absolute nause.
What is astonishing is the broad concept that the primary website for advice applies to what is indecent. Disgustingly, they label nudity as indecent.
The quote below is very revealing.
"Gaynor Birnie of ChildLine said: “The sharing of self-generated sexually explicit images or videos by mobile phone or online is now commonplace amongst young people to the point that it is considered 'mundane'.
Worryingly, in contrast to the scale of the problem, relatively few young people are calling ChildLine to talk about the issue, whether for fear of being judged or being reported to the authorities."
Worryingly, in contrast to the scale of the problem, relatively few young people are calling ChildLine to talk about the issue, whether for fear of being judged or being reported to the authorities."
"Most common contacts to ChildLine are when the issue has escalated beyond their control.”
Childlines own reveals a up to 40% of people under 18 are sexting.
Could it be that it is mundane to many because that is exactly what its is? Gaynor Birnie bemoaning the lack of people calling childline is a very odd thing to say, surely she she should be happy not worried.
She is right that they should fear being judged, these young people already have been, your body is indecent, get it! Your private sexual life is fair game for the media, protectionists and the police. They will be reported, if one partner is 20 and the other 17 again, they will be reported, as the 17 year old could be automatically classed as at risk of grooming and abuse and then both their lives, and the lives of friends and family, will be torn to shreds.
It is not possible for the naked human body to be indecent and spreading that anti human garbage is disgusting.
It's an issue because we have made it one, the morality that wishes to chase down and then caution a young woman such as the incident above from the telegraph, shows we have lost the plot.
It should not be illegal to post an image of yourself at all. What should be a matter of the criminal and not civil courts (as it currently is) is the sharing of that image afterwards.
The boyfriend was cautioned, not because he shared a private image however, but because he shared a supposed indecent image, of a 17 year old, who he had been dating.
Should she not have accepted the caution, then insisted on a Crown Court Trial and let a jury decide where the indecency lie?
We would rather place our trust in 12 members of the public than the protectionists and their lackeys.
Bear in mind an indecent image can be a fully clothed one by the definition used by the police. Really, it is simply in the eye of the beholder, and categorising the beauty of a childs or young persons body as inherently indecent is disgraceful.
We would like to apologise to the young lady, that is the degree of shame we feel about the puritanical and perverse laws that have been used against you, and we are sorry.
To the young man we would like to say this,
you should never have shared those pictures and rightly paid the price, if for the wrong reasons. The primary reason to not do so is plain human decency, which you showed a remarkable lack of.
To any young person out there, who is thinking of sharing a selfie they cannot be sure will stay with the individual/s they send it to, don't. Not because you are indecent or there is any shame in your sexual activity, alone or with others.
But for the reason everyone should be aware of, if you involve the state, protectionists and puritans in your life or in the life of another, then be prepared to see people destroyed, because that is exactly what these laws do, and you will live to regret it.
Childlines own reveals a up to 40% of people under 18 are sexting.
Could it be that it is mundane to many because that is exactly what its is? Gaynor Birnie bemoaning the lack of people calling childline is a very odd thing to say, surely she she should be happy not worried.
She is right that they should fear being judged, these young people already have been, your body is indecent, get it! Your private sexual life is fair game for the media, protectionists and the police. They will be reported, if one partner is 20 and the other 17 again, they will be reported, as the 17 year old could be automatically classed as at risk of grooming and abuse and then both their lives, and the lives of friends and family, will be torn to shreds.
It is not possible for the naked human body to be indecent and spreading that anti human garbage is disgusting.
It's an issue because we have made it one, the morality that wishes to chase down and then caution a young woman such as the incident above from the telegraph, shows we have lost the plot.
It should not be illegal to post an image of yourself at all. What should be a matter of the criminal and not civil courts (as it currently is) is the sharing of that image afterwards.
The boyfriend was cautioned, not because he shared a private image however, but because he shared a supposed indecent image, of a 17 year old, who he had been dating.
Should she not have accepted the caution, then insisted on a Crown Court Trial and let a jury decide where the indecency lie?
We would rather place our trust in 12 members of the public than the protectionists and their lackeys.
Bear in mind an indecent image can be a fully clothed one by the definition used by the police. Really, it is simply in the eye of the beholder, and categorising the beauty of a childs or young persons body as inherently indecent is disgraceful.
We would like to apologise to the young lady, that is the degree of shame we feel about the puritanical and perverse laws that have been used against you, and we are sorry.
To the young man we would like to say this,
you should never have shared those pictures and rightly paid the price, if for the wrong reasons. The primary reason to not do so is plain human decency, which you showed a remarkable lack of.
To any young person out there, who is thinking of sharing a selfie they cannot be sure will stay with the individual/s they send it to, don't. Not because you are indecent or there is any shame in your sexual activity, alone or with others.
But for the reason everyone should be aware of, if you involve the state, protectionists and puritans in your life or in the life of another, then be prepared to see people destroyed, because that is exactly what these laws do, and you will live to regret it.
